Leaving Baggage Behind
A number of
elements need to be explored for us to understand what is happening in this
passage. In the first place, the number of disciples Jesus sends gives us clues
about Luke’s intention. In Jewish tradition it is seventy elders who are
commissioned to translate the law and the prophets from Hebrew to Greek; in
Luke’s hands this is an allusion to the mission of God to the whole world. In
other Jewish texts, such as Genesis 10, the number of nations in the world is
seventy. So the setting of the sending is the anticipated mission of the gospel
to the whole world (in the book of Acts).
Jesus’s
instructions (Luke 10:3–4) to his disciples strike readers as weird. He says,
“Go! I am sending you out like lambs among wolves. Do not take a purse or bag
or sandals; and do not greet anyone on the road”. They were not to take a lot
of baggage with them on their journey. In essence they were not to depend on
their own resources. In the context of the first century, these followers
were sent out on their mission as strangers who would be in need of hospitality
from people of the towns and villages. Luke is suggesting that the mission
of God moves forward in the world when disciples of Jesus choose to become like
strangers in their communities so they will be dependent on their hosts.
The story of this
sending, then, is not only to
illustrate the mission of God to the
whole world but also to show the manner in which this mission is to
be carried out. It is radically different from the conceptions of mission that
characterize the churches of our time. In the ancient Middle East, strangers
were an important part of the overall cultural mix. They were the outsiders who, for one reason or another, were
dependent on the hospitality of others for their survival, and there were
strict laws about how the stranger was to be treated. But this was a two-way
street. In such a culture, the village people took in the stranger because they
knew that at any time in the future they or their children might become
strangers themselves and need to be taken in. There was a deep sympathy in this
relationship to the stranger. It is important to understand what lies behind
the suggestion here if we are to have any idea of God’s intention. It appears
there is a connection, a link between being in the place of the stranger in
need and being able to
discern God’s working in the world. This story is suggesting that the one
is a forerunner of the other.
In the Old
Testament story of Elijah, this dynamic is at work (see 1 Kings 17). After Ahab
and his Baalist wife, Jezebel, kill the prophets of Israel, Elijah flees to the
Kerith ravine where he is fed for a time by ravens …note the connections ….that
of being in the place of a stranger in need and finding the place where food is
given…these are also connected in Luke’s story. …Elijah must move on because
there is no water in that part of the desert…he is genuinely a man outside his
own context (Surroundings) and in need of help from someone. ..The Lord directs
him to the city of Zerepath (a Gentile city of Baal worshipers-Jezebel’s very own
people), where he meets a widow who provides hospitality to this Jew. ….Elijah,
with nothing, dwells in the house of the widow and in that context, discovers
again, anew, what God is calling him to do. …Elijah must dwell with the other to discern God’s purposes. It
meant that this Gentile woman could not be seen as the “enemy,” as the outsider
who has nothing to give, but as the one who will provide the table around which
Elijah might reimagine his calling. This is boundary breaking!
This is the way in
which Luke frames Jesus’ sending of the seventy. The fascinating characteristic
of Elijah’s story is that he finds himself pushed outside his own community. He
becomes a stranger because the world of Israel has been taken from him. In this
new and dangerous place, Elijah is forced to ask difficult questions about God
and about the relationship between God and Israel.
This….was also the
situation of the Gentile Christians to whom Luke was writing. The parallel can
be made in this way. ….Elijah’s world was fundamentally confused when the
assumptions he had about what God was doing were challenged….. This also
happened to the Gentile communities to whom Luke was writing. ….Elijah found
answers to these questions of confusion as he was forced outside his
established world and placed in situations where he became dependent on the
hospitality of those who should have been in need of his ministry…. Is it the
case that the boundary-breaking Spirit is placing these Gentile Christians in
similar setting? I think so.
So,…. bridging the
context to our time, in our city, in our communities, is He, the Spirit of God
doing a similar thing with us?
Will the church discover answers to our crisis of identity
as we become willing to enter a similar experience of becoming like strangers
who, without baggage, must enter the towns and villages to receive hospitality
from the other?
Leaving baggage behind is a key part of what Luke is saying.
This leaving baggage behind is about a radical reorientation of how to answer
the question of what God is doing in our world. This is unfamiliar to and far
from the ways in which most churches “send” people into the communities in
which we live.
Take the way we evangelize as an example. Our current ways
of evangelizing calls for many different ways of engaging people. Usually we
develop categories that we put people of our community into then we make plans
based on what “seeker” type of events and programs we think, “outsiders”, we
call them “they” would be interested in joining or attending. We ask, what
needs do people have that a program we can institute might address? …
…. the church sends
people into the neighborhood fully loaded, fully armed with research, and
methods for assessing someone’s readiness for the next step, and with nice
programs to offer. In other words, churches send out people with plenty of
prepacked baggage.
We go with a huge
amount of baggage. All of this baggage will continually blind us to what God is
doing in the communities where we live, because when we take baggage, we assume
we already know who the people are and what they need. All the questions of
what God might be doing are we have already answered, compiled and turned into
sellable programs and strategies.
When we send people out with baggage,
we lose two things-the ability to see people and their needs as they really are
and an openness to what God is
doing.
So, first we objectify people. We put them
into our categories. They are not the other who we must dwell among and be
present to, but they are a category, for which we have plans. When this is our
focus, we can’t listen to the person
who stands before us as a human being…he or she is the object of our plans. And
that, I believe, is baggage of the worst kind.
Secondly, we have already determined
what God is up to and, so, what needs to happen. But, in the boundary-breaking
work of the Spirit, this is precisely where we need a different approach. We cannot ask the question of what God is
up to in our neighborhoods and communities when we think we already know.
And it seems to me that Luke is trying to tell us something of critical
importance in these brief instructions. That in a time of boundary-breaking,
when established assumptions about how it is all supposed to turn out are no
longer practical, then we must take a radically different road. We must
leave our baggage behind and be willing to become like a stranger in need of the
welcome and care of the other…. if we stand any chance of answering the
question, what is God up to in our world today.
Most of us are
trying to figure out all the best, seeker-friendly ways to get someone to come
to something we are offering. And, “our”
plans and what “we” want to achieve are what’s most important. But
these are huge pieces of baggage, which prevents our listening to and receiving
from the other.
But, Luke points us in a different direction. …This is a
text that helps sketch a new map of the road ahead. The thoughts and
imaginations of the past cannot provide when the boundary-breaking Spirit of
God breaks through with a new meaning for what being God’s people means in our
world today.
I believe that this is exactly what is happening in our
time….I believe Luke is trying to help us understand just that. Ridgecrest, we
need to release our baggage. God want us to listen and receive from the
“others” in our neighborhoods and communities. Luke is trying to point us in a
direction. He is providing for us a map, a blueprint of the road ahead. An old
way of thinking and imagining will not provide when God’s Holy Spirit is
breaking through as He is in our city and community and neighborhoods with an
understanding of what it means to be God’s people in our world today.
No comments:
Post a Comment